| ▲ | CodeWriter23 7 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fun fact, Win 95, 98 and ME booted DOS and autoexec'd win for you. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | masfuerte 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, but like Windows for Workgroups before them, they didn't need to rely on DOS services once they had started. They were 32-bit multitasking OSes that could host multiple DOS VMs and (in the case of WfW) a 16-bit cooperatively multitasked GUI. DOS basically acted as a bootloader. But all of those OSes had the very weird feature that they could switch back into a virtualised copy of their bootloader. I do feel that Wikipedia understates the importance of Windows for Workgroups. Internally, it wasn't just Windows 3.1 with networking. It was a trial run for the fundamentals of the Windows 95 architecture. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||