| ▲ | amelius 4 hours ago | |
This is like saying a sculpture always existed, the sculptor just had to remove the superfluous material. Or like a musical octave has only 12 semitones, so all music is just a selection from a finite set that already existed. Sure the insane computation we're throwing at this changes our perspective, but still there is an important distinction. | ||
| ▲ | npfries 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Bob Ross would like a word. He frequently talked about objects or features already existing, and using the tools at his disposal to “find” them. | ||
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | paulddraper 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The difference is that math answers (can answer) specific questions. Like, "does the Riemann zeta function have zeroes that don't have real part 1/2," or "is there a better solution to the Erdős Unit Distance Problem." The selection of question is matter of taste, but once selected, there is a definitive precise answer. | ||