| ▲ | sa46 6 hours ago | |
Railway has an overwhelming incentive to pin the blame on Google. This report doesn't answer why Google suspended Railway's account. I'd wait for more details before adjudicating. | ||
| ▲ | jerf 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
In principle, I agree with you. In practice, Google has earned the way my priors are ready to believe it's 100% their fault with mighty and sustained effort. Or lack thereof, depending on your point of view. | ||
| ▲ | subscribed 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
That would be approximately 6365262822 time Google suspended someone for no good reason. So no, Google doesn't get the benefit of the doubt. | ||
| ▲ | CPLX 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
They said it was automated and affected a bunch of other customers, which gives at least some hint. And in general Google lost any immediate benefit of the doubt status many years ago. Many such stories. | ||
| ▲ | sophacles 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
To quote the article: > Google Cloud placed Railway’s production account into a suspended status incorrectly, as part of an automated action. This action extended to many accounts within Google Cloud. As this was a platform-wide action, there was no proactive outreach to individual customers prior to the restriction. | ||