| ▲ | dantillberg 6 hours ago | |||||||
What drives Google to apply these actions so completely and immediately, versus a more deliberate approach, with notification and delay before action, manual review for paying customers, or a warning to resolve within X hours/days? Once or twice could be errors or bad implementation, but these can't explain away the pattern. It would seem that Google's counsel has deemed that whenever _____ is detected, the company must immediately and completely sever the business relationship. What is that driving concern? Is it sanctions enforcement? CSAM? Something else? | ||||||||
| ▲ | BitWiseVibe 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It could be automated action based on abuse reports. TONS of spam comes from Railway associated networks. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | e40 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The problem is scale. Google uses automation and doesn't have the people to review the actions of that automation. I never worked at Google but this is the most obvious explanation from watching these things happen for years and years. Please, someone that worked at Google, please comment. | ||||||||