>Do they have a choice?

Yes, they absolutely have a choice. People can choose to not assist with transgressions against human rights in the year 2026 :)

Meta is not people, it's a publicly traded company that's practically legally required to make money and grow infinitely.

You however, as people, can choose not to patronize a Meta that assists with transgressions against human rights.

	▲	slg 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		>Meta is not people, it's a publicly traded company that's practically legally required to make money and grow infinitely. Has a company ever faced any sort of legal repercussions for sacrificing profit for moral reasons? That isn't rhetorical. I'm not aware of this ever happening, so I'm dubious of your claim.
	▲	LocalH 13 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Meta is a legal person in almost all jurisdictions it operates within It is also operated by human individuals as employees and c-suite
	▲	looneysquash 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		And companies are legal fiction. Meta doesn't remove a post, a person does. Or maybe some software built by a person. A person from a government told a person at Meta to block it, and that person did (probably by telling yet more people to do it).