Why would anyone spend the time to read something so long that's been generated by an LLM? The topic seems super interesting otherwise and would benefit from the real human voice. OP, can you elaborate on why you decided to go this direction?

▲

NooneAtAll3 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

because it is a propaganda piece

the cheaper it is made, the more effort can be spent elsewhere

	▲	danieltanfh95 36 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I considered against publishing this piece because it could be taken as propaganda. But America did derive the same idea, back in 1878 and was part of philosophy behind the New Deal. So what do Americans have to be sour about and call it propaganda for, when the American academia and government abandoned empiricism for whatever they believed in 2026?

▲

0x3f 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Why would anyone spend the time to read something so long that's been generated by an LLM?

What diference does it make as long as the content is interesting and the tone not grating?

It's possible for a human being to use an LLM but guide it to a well-written piece that's worth consuming.

	▲	mingus88 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The tone is grating. That’s why we notice it. If the LLM output was indistinguishable from real human text nobody would say anything, because by definition we wouldn’t be able to tell.
	▲	rubenflamshep 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Nah, if a human can't be bothered to write it themselves, I can't be bothered to read it.