Sorry, I think this got confused because you can only reply so deep. I meant conspiracy theory folks should have the burden of proof. If you're saying that's completely naive in the current climate, I agree. I am only arguing that's how we should treat commenters who seem more than 7 bubbles off plumb: ignore entirely unless they provide reason not to.

> ignore entirely unless they provide reason not to

The reason not to is they start trending and then infecting the political system. By the time anyone brings evidence to the table, the status quo has been shifted.