| ▲ | chadgpt3 4 hours ago | |
The third option is to ignore them and let them block you. In a democracy this causes lots of public outrage and might be reversed. Not sure how it goes in authoritarian monarchies. | ||
| ▲ | patrickmay 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
This is the answer. Stop operating in authoritarian states and ignore their laws. If those states want to censor what their population can see, it's on them to establish a firewall. | ||
| ▲ | greentea23 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
While we're fantasizing about evil people doing the noble thing: the fourth option is for Meta to takes its vast wealth and help build resilient uncensorable communications instead of doubling down on centralized and surveilled social networks. | ||