| ▲ | chuckadams an hour ago | |||||||
If that behavior is the entire point, then I think the bigger point is that the spec should reflect that and not call it undefined. | ||||||||
| ▲ | voakbasda an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I suspect that many undefined behaviors reflect the inability of the standard committee to come to a consensus on the nuances involved. “Punt to the implementers” is a way to allow every tool vendor to select their own expected behavior in those cases. | ||||||||
| ||||||||