(Submitted title was "Ben Welsh made an index of all FiveThirtyEight articles on the Internet Archive" - we've since changed it)

Cheers for the clarity, that'll help me look less weird wrt above comment to future historians of archived HN threads :-)

TBH I enjoyed looking up Ben and finding out what he's about and done in the past far more than I did just knowing there's a 538 archive on IA.

What do you think was perceived wrong with the old title?

	▲	defrost 9 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		At a guess (my Telepathy/IP is weak today, I'm not reading dang at usual strength) .. the initially submitted title was "invented" for submission and didn't match the content title. HN veers toward "the guts of the content w/out decoration" - limited additional information, framing, weasel words, perceived slanting, etc. It's uncommon to name an author unless the author themself is an important part of "the story". I personally have no issue with the original title, however it's not really for me (non US citizen) to judge whether the reporter in question has a name / identity that carries weight in US IT circles.