> So you are in the"nothing to hide, nothing to fear" school of privacy rights?

No, but you are in the school that teaches that false equivalence is valid rationale.

> Only criminals and bad actors want private defaults

As I was saying.

> The burden of proof is proving there is some harm or problem that needs solving and noone has managed that in this thread or generally.

"Burden of proof" is a concept borrowed from legal practice where the accuser has to offer proof that the accused commited a crime.

No crime is being implied here. Watermarking is actually a useful feature so that people can easily identify images as AI generated.