So 999 people that are just making an image need to be DRM'ed so that you might catch the 1 person making "realistic but deceptive" images... like this is some kind of special case of ... internet images.

▲

space_fountain 4 hours ago | parent [-]

This isn't DRM right? This is metadata attached to the image that makes it clear it was synthetically generated. The public has a huge incentive to know when images are AI generated and the harm to legitimate users seems pretty small: aka someone might complain online that you use AI

	▲	raron 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Not yet, but it is easy to imagine many ways it would be used for DRM.
	▲	WhatIsDukkha 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		billions? of "fake" images not generated by ai but just photoshopped and ... not really harmful. There is no case that any of its particularly harmful outside of things like CSAM which is illegal.