| ▲ | himata4113 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
if you tell it to generate the AI image with a black background you can visually see the synthid with a good enough monitor, it's just a repeating fuzzy pattern, nothing special. I have found great success of getting rid of it by masking every 2nd pixel, regenerating missing pixels and then once again masking every 2nd pixel offset by 1. Used an off the shelf model to fill in the pixels, but I also exported a depthmap first (before any alternations) and denoised it so generated masked pixels comform to the original content. The result was obviously not 100% perfect, but with more time and a model fine tuned for this specific use-case would be able to remove any kind of ai watermarking without too many issues. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | teravor 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
i wouldn't have any confidence in being able to remove a 0.5 bit watermark (presence/absence). what you see is probably a functional decoy. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | userbinator 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
but with more time and a model fine tuned for this specific use-case would be able to remove any kind of ai watermarking without too many issues. Always amusing to see AI used against itself. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | m00dy 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It’s definitely hackable, Some of our engineers worked on this long time ago https://deepwalker.xyz/blog/bypassing-synthid-in-gemini-phot... | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tantalor 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
But why | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sigbeta 21 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
[dead] | |||||||||||||||||