Your comment is easily misunderstood, my first thought was also “that’s NPM” - but the idea of providing tests and types without implementation is a pretty interesting one.

▲

to11mtm 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I mean in my head it is 'Plugin system', at least in the context of feature bloat.

Where it can get slightly hairy is that to do it well, you need to have a LOT of seams between layers.

> but the idea of providing tests and types without implementation is a pretty interesting one.

I feel like in my head, you need to have -some- baseline/example implementation; e.x. Akka/Pekko/Akka.NET have Plugin specs for Persistence but there's still a Memory-only implementation of Persistence as a reference/baseline; after all you need to make sure the spec is possible at all.

	▲	usernametaken29 25 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I think the biggest adoption stopper would be that building a dependency chain (like say a JSON parser) could already be quite many functions. As the end user you don’t care about the architecture of JSON, you just want to consume it and get an object. In the end you might virtually end up with libraries again, because in some sense abstractions over functions are libraries. There’d still be a win though because if you store the execution AST in a common database you can provide consistently tested primitives over many languages… However I think outside of functional programming circles no one really actually cares enough about this to tackle it