| ▲ | site-packages1 5 hours ago |
| I don't know I really like the definitive indicator that something is AI so I can completely ignore anything else that comes from them. |
|
| ▲ | spike021 35 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Are markers being removed here the same or similar to ones tools might add if you use an AI tool just to edit a photo? like a more complicated object removal in a photo editor? |
|
| ▲ | sgarman 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think the issue is it was never definitive. This is a great way to show people that. |
| |
| ▲ | esafak 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I have not read anyone claim that SynthID had a false alarm issue, so if it returned positive I would believe it is synthetic. | | |
| ▲ | Retr0id an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | You can trivially false-flag any image by uploading it to gemini and asking it to return it as-is | | |
| ▲ | free_bip an hour ago | parent [-] | | That's not what the previous comment is referring to. They're referring to false positives, i.e "Gemini did not generate this (or process it) yet it says SynthID confirmed" |
| |
| ▲ | Wacari 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | it does have a false negative issue |
|
|
|
| ▲ | recursive 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If someone's doing something you don't like, you can't really count on them doing it the way you prefer. |
| |
| ▲ | streetfighter64 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can count on them doing it in a way that's economical for them. It's how email spam filters and ad blockers work. Sure somebody will always find a way to bypass it, and that's the arms race. A filter with zero false positives that removes 80% of slop is pretty darn good though. |
|