you would watch a movie generated with the sterility of an LLM?

AI is already in a bunch of creative workflows. Just look at modern Photoshop. Selecting and hitting delete has AI infill for the background replacement.

Creates can these video gen AI in various ways. There are some youtube channels of people using these in creative workflows that are really impressive, from mocap replacement, character insertion, background replacement, changing camera angle in post, animating/inserting characters from character boards, animated between stills generated in traditional methods, etc. It's not just "prompt and generate". It can be, because it's easy, but it also doesn't have to be. It's a tool.

	▲	mackeye 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		i do photo restoration as part of my research (bizarre place to be for a math undergrad), so i do think AI is a lifesaver for very small adjustments that would be tedious or subpar otherwise. i just disagree that its creative output is of value (which isn't the case you made, anyway).
	▲	CommanderData 23 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I do wonder how studios are working around consistent human faces, it's a problem on almost every discussion forum I have read for AI videos and not something that seems to be solved yet. Do you have any examples of those creative workflows that have made it into Hollywood for example?

▲

raincole 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think Hollywood's obsession with unnecessary sex scenes[0] is the #1 reason I have been watching less and less movies. So yeah, probably.

[0] e.g. Don't Look Up

▲

garciasn 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sure; why not? It has to be better than some of the absolute garbage that's out on the various streaming services today; right?

	▲	mackeye 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		god help us if we have to choose between the two );

▲

yojo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Me? No. My kids? I think they already have. I don’t allow YouTube in our house, but they for sure watch slop with friends.