| ▲ | r_lee 3 hours ago |
| can't wait to hear all about the new Agentic workflows you can build with AI and build with agentic agent swarms and build more workflows to do more with Enterprise AI with Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and elevate efficiency with the power of AI and unlock value with AI agents. also can't wait to hear more about AI integrations across Google AI Workspace, like AI Gmail or AI docs (powered by Gemini Enterprise AI). also can't wait to empower myself with more AI-powered data that will be unlocked with agents. AI. |
|
| ▲ | Alive-in-2025 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I can't think of a way to mock all the ai hype more than what they actually just talk about. "Next, our hacker news AI agent reads and comments for you based on your commenting history, no need to think or do anything at all - we'll automate your time wasting and make better, more relevant jokes than you & your karma score will increase exponentially." |
| |
|
| ▲ | andriy_koval 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I hope you didn't type all of this yourself, but use some AI agent slopgen workflow.. |
| |
| ▲ | r_lee 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | typed it all on my phone. I didn't even have to come up with anything, it just came out naturally. I guess you could say I've become AI-native | | |
| ▲ | 52-6F-62 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Are you working for hire? I'd like you to join my team where we are automating parametrizing paradigms to foster growth in changing paradigms of parametrizing workflows. | | |
| ▲ | r_lee 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | yes I am. I prefer a modern 996 schedule to maximize efficiency. let me know how I can contact you and we can set up a meeting to discuss collaboration and elevate our synergies to grow revenue through AI powered velocity | | | |
| ▲ | rurp 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Zero new synergies?! Doesn't sound like a real project to me. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | gordon_freeman 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| AIAIAIAIAIAI...to<infinity> |
|
| ▲ | tpurves 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Well in that case, I predict you are going to be in luck! |
|
| ▲ | vatsachak 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Powerful. AI |
|
| ▲ | talloaktrees 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| i went to Google Cloud Next last month, this comment is on point |
|
| ▲ | rkagerer 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I went to every single I/O since the very first one, but stopped going last year after finding it utterly uninteresting due to this fixation. It's great hearing about new tech, but it felt like every single session was either about AI or had AI awkwardly crammed into it - even sessions where it had nothing to do with the core subject matter. It was like some gatekeeper told the engineers their topic wouldn't make the lineup unless the word "AI" was in the title. |
|
| ▲ | geraneum 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Steve Burke, is that you? |
|
| ▲ | renegade-otter 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Cognitive surrender, wash over my person! |
|
| ▲ | gekoxyz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| bro I read this, opened the keynote stream and the presenter said "Agents in Gemini" HAHAHAHA |
|
| ▲ | salemh 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | southbay567 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Honestly getting tired of this knee jerk anti-AI stance here on HN. We’re talking about the most revolutionary technology in history that’s going to change every facet of our lives. It’s getting toxic, now we have people getting booed at graduations for just mentioning AI. There will be a transition but it’s not the end of the world. Don’t cling to the past, look forward to the future. |
| |
| ▲ | r_lee 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I get that. but what kind of a future are we talking about? unlike previous advances, I'm not really that optimistic here. | |
| ▲ | reaperducer 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | the most revolutionary technology in history Fire.
Electricity.
The wheel.
The printing press.
Assembly lines.
Flight.
The computer.
Space exploration. Anyone else care to contribute? | | |
|
|
| ▲ | numlock86 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| While I get your point, this kind of gives me "Old man yelling at cloud" vibes. Yes, all the AI talk and bullshit bingo became quite annoying at this point, and I also can't wait for it to settle. But AI is here, and it's here to stay. Wether we like it or not. It's like what dotcom was for the internet back then. We'll get through this eventually - with a bubble bursting here and there - but making fun of it with overtuned phrases like "Everything will be connected to the internet in the future, even your fridge, car and toothbrush!" won't age too well I am afraid. |
| |
| ▲ | dguest 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think the point is that AI was here 40 years ago [1]. LLMs/RAGs/Transformers are the newish thing that's here to stay. I've seen my colleagues vocabulary regress from "training transformers" to just "using AI", without clarifying if are using claude or actually building a network. I was recently told that no one says "vibe coding" any more (now it "agentic AI", I was told). My colleague who does ML research was told he was the only one at his workplace that wasn't doing AI. So the problem isn't the technology (a lot of the technology is great), it's that the discussion around it has been dumbed down by hype. [1]: https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1985-04-rescan | |
| ▲ | r_lee 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm Gen Z.. and I'm just regurgitating what Google sends me via email and funny things like renaming Vertex AI to "Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform" (not a joke) even though Vertex is mostly used for inference, e.g. Claude via gcloud or fine tuning models etc. and I use Claude code every day, so I'm not like completely dismissing AI/agentic stuff. | |
| ▲ | breezybottom 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | People thought Pets.com was here to stay as well | | |
| ▲ | meta_ai_x 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | chewy.com is literally pets.com and it is thriving. Remember HN is mocking the capability/technology itself not the ability of specific firms to survive. | | |
| ▲ | gruez 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | >chewy.com is literally pets.com and it is thriving. Seems like a stretch, considering it's down 50% compared to a year ago. https://www.nyse.com/quote/XNYS:CHWY | |
| ▲ | topaz0 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Chewy.com is not pets.com. They're in the same market, but it's not useful to say that a business built around limitless hypergrowth is the same as a business built around medium sized sustainability. | |
| ▲ | breezybottom 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It seems pretty clear to me that we've exhausted the possibilities of the transformer architecture. Whatever we're using in 20 years will certainly be a different technology. |
| |
| ▲ | simianwords 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The analogy doesn't work at all. Pets is a single small company. The dot-com boom largely survived and was profoundly important. I just.. I don't know the mental model of the people who speak like this. What is the point you are trying to make.. | | |
| ▲ | breezybottom an hour ago | parent [-] | | Ok, then people thought Enron was here to stay, until it wasn't. Life is ephemeral. |
|
| |
| ▲ | port11 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The point is that other topics exist that deserve talking about. There is SO much talk about LLMs everywhere, and in this kind of event they will eclipse other, perhaps more interesting conversations. | |
| ▲ | topaz0 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The old man yelling at the cloud is often correct, just powerless. | | | |
| ▲ | reaperducer 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | gives me … vibes. Your writing says a lot about you, too. |
|