| ▲ | LetsGetTechnicl 4 hours ago |
| Why would I want to vibe code a "fully functional operating system"? |
|
| ▲ | Andrex 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Tinkering and experimentation. Could be a good use for older hardware. Why not. |
| |
| ▲ | LetsGetTechnicl 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | How would unoptimized slop code be good for older hardware? That's what Linux and other projects are for. If you wanted to tinker and learn how operating systems work, you'd code one yourself like I did in CS classes. You'd actually learn something and you get the good feeling of having done it yourself. | |
| ▲ | globular-toast 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You won't understand a thing, though. You already have the source code for Linux, Minix and tons of other OSes, pedagogical or otherwise. Why generate yet another that you won't understand? |
|
|
| ▲ | MrDarcy 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why wouldn’t you want to? |
| |
| ▲ | kibwen 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Because it's an activity with zero benefit and nonzero cost? | |
| ▲ | sethops1 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because it cost $1000 in tokens? | |
| ▲ | dakiol 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Because it would be sponsored by anthropic/google/openai? You cannot do it (typically) without paying for the tokens they only can offer. Programming used to be free, but slowly, we need to pay for every single line of code. It's sickening |
|
|
| ▲ | amaks 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's an example of AI coding agents successfully completing complex coding tasks. |
| |
| ▲ | gowld 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't want a toy copy of something that already exists. I want something new. |
|