| ▲ | SoftTalker 4 hours ago | |
Yeah it sucks when partitions that were sized 8-10 years ago are no longer adequate. I've hit the "/usr is too small to complete an upgrade" trap myself. When that happened I rejected the installer's partition suggestions and made /usr substantially larger (this is also necessary if you're going to be building large ports, which also happens under /usr). So far that has worked for me. Some people would also argue that using an 8 year old device as a critical path in your LAN is a risk in itself. Taking routers down to do upgrades is pretty common in the enterprise IT world. | ||
| ▲ | hedora an hour ago | parent [-] | |
It’s not just the partition sizing though. The lack of DDNS and clock re-sync are really painful. Similarly, if fsck -y is frequently required, maybe just run that way all the time instead of failing to boot, or fix the root problem. I doubt many sers are taking block level backups for forensic repair in case they need to hand assemble inodes. Anyway, I wish them well. I want a simple, correct and rock solid OS for this sort of use case. The three pillars of computer security are confidentiality, integrity and availability. Hopefully they’ll focus a bit more on the latter two things than they have recently. | ||