Honestly, if Skynet were possible, Anthropic would probably build it first and claim they had to because OpenAI is bad.

NitpickLawyer 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

And then regulatory capture it to death. Seriously, Anthropic is top notch in their coding models, but they are not the good guys in the tech vs. product for humanity's sake debate.

▲

dwa3592 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

yeah but i don't think there's any large org which is 'good guys'. Anyone who wants to become a monopoly or very very large is probably suffering from some sort of a neural condition (psychosis, if plural) which we will study 100 years from now. Right now they are rewarded but I think our little minds forget to take the negative externalities into account.

I am working on a short story on this topic which is set in 2100s, where most humans have internalized the concept of 'having enough' after the great conflict. But some specimen have started to show signs of this syndrome again, and neuroscientists and psychologists are grappling to understand where it originated from.

▲

amunozo 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The difference is that Anthropic pretend they're the good guys, while the rest don't.

	▲	vavos 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's like the Mike prince arc in the show billions

▲

CamperBob2 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

yeah but i don't think there's any large org which is 'good guys'.

There are several. They're in China, releasing competitive open-weight models on a regular basis.

	▲	xp84 a few seconds ago \| parent [-]
		Ah yes, the famous altruistic China, no profit or national security motives, doing it all purely for the love of the game.

▲

slashdave an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

So... do you see a problem with regulating skynet to not kill us all?

▲

scottyah 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Anthropic has drawn lines with the most powerful organization in the world, that OpenAI capitulated on within hours for a small contract.

▲

bugufu8f83 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Their statement on this issue opened by emphasizing how eager they are to help kill people:

>I believe deeply in the existential importance of using AI to defend the United States and other democracies, and to defeat our autocratic adversaries.

There is no universe where this can be described as anything close to ethical.

	▲	fasterik an hour ago \| parent [-]
		It's not controversial to say that democracy is a more ethical form of government than autocracy. It's also not controversial to say that violence is sometimes justified when it's in self-defence or to prevent a greater injustice from happening. So what's the ethical objection to that statement?

▲

siren2026 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Let me rephrase this.

Anthropic played a really well orchestrated marketing gimmick so that they would be in the headlines for a couple days bringing awareness to non-tech people on how they are supposedly the good guys. They then backpedaled all of this and are in contract with the DoD once the headlines passed.

But this obviously worked as you now believe they are the good guys

▲

solenoid0937 an hour ago | parent [-]

They didn't backpedal at all, you're spreading FUD.

Their red lines are still in place. They are the only AI company with those red lines.

▲

siren2026 an hour ago | parent [-]

Ah yes, right

[1] https://www.obsolete.pub/p/exclusive-anthropic-is-quietly-ba... [2] https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/25/tech/anthropic-safety-pol... [3] https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-dials-back-ai-safety-c...

	▲	albumen an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Those sources don’t claim Anthropic is crossing its red lines (AI-controlled weapons and mass domestic surveillance of American citizens).

▲

dwa3592 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

100% and that was bold and set a good example, at least from the outside.

▲

actualwitch 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

...and then silently got back to talks with DoD [0] and gave them the Mythos model. Separately, they went back on their promise to only develop models that they can guarantee are safe [1]. I reckon considering which country they are HQ'ed in, building skynet is in their destiny.

[0] https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/01/pentagon-anthropic-blacklist...

[1] https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/anthropic-...

▲

siren2026 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Exactly.

This good guy ("AI Safety") versus bad guy is all marketing gimmicks. I'm old enough that it reminds me of Google "don't be evil".

What I find worse is that some people actually believe Anthropic are really the good guys.

▲

solenoid0937 an hour ago | parent [-]

You should chat with some people involved in AI safety, if you really think it's a farce.

	▲	cma 27 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		There's a wide variety of seriousness https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIg4zQKBpAs
	▲	siren2026 an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Imagine being gullible enough to think any of those companies would ever chose AI safety over losing their monopolies in AI. AI safety is important. My point is: you should have zero trust in those companies to actually care about AI Safety besides the marketing and PR aspect of it. Incentives matter.

▲

goatlover 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Skynet is being built on the Ukrainian/Russian front lines.