Everything is politics.

Which food you eat (are you vegan? carnivore diet? Both have implications in regards to animal welfare, climate change, soil use, identity etc etc), which media you consume (obvious), which job you have (which power structures do you strengthen with it? who benefits from your labor? who do you try to disrupt?).

To say one is "apolitical" is just voicing a preference for the status quo.

To decry something as political is just voicing one's political opposition to the view expressed.

▲

energy123 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's a pretty depressing worldview. Children playing in the park aren't being political. It's possible to just exist sometimes.

▲

pixl97 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>Children playing in the park aren't being political

I can assure you they absolutely are. Of course there isn't a well defined elected government here, but 'social politics' between children are absolutely occurring. Things like looks, material goods, clothes, ability to take care of themselves, etc all affect how they interact with each other and who is popular and gets to take the lead/be bullies/etc.

HN posters can be really clueless to the world around them at times.

	▲	alxjrvs 16 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		We don't even have to zoom in, to be honest. What children? What park? The presence of a park pre-supposes a political society that has prioritized parks, the budget to enact those priorities, and the space to do so. Any one of those can spiral into its own political microcosm. How is that park maintained? Is there a special kids area of the park? Is it "for kids" or is it "The kids area", implying that kids aren't allowed in the rest of the park? Are the children not allowed in the park after a certain time - and who decides that time, and why? Sometimes the park is used for town events, but can get rented out. Who decides that? Complexity is inherent, from the atoms to the galaxies. Any rejection of that is just plugging your ears, willfully or not.

▲

maxlamb 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But that park was probably created as a result of a vote or other political process.

▲

fzeroracer an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not that long ago that black children were barred from being in the same space as white children so at one point yes, it was political.

▲

brendoelfrendo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The children playing in a park aren't being political, and are largely insulated from the politics of playing in a park... but those circumstances are surrounded by all kinds of political process. As another commenter said, the park's existence is probably due to politics; as are the rules the children need to follow, what activities are permitted, the safety and maintenance of park equipment and facilities, curfews, etc. It is also a choice on the part of the parents to let their kids play in a park, and which parks their kids play in, and those choices aren't made in a vacuum. Perhaps the perspective of the adult should not be to view children in the park as apolitical, but to be cognizant of the processes that influence their children and try to ensure that they work for the children's benefit.

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]

▲

rationalist 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Maybe I just want to eat what tastes good, and not have to worry about how what I chose on the menu is going to support a politician, political party, businessperson, etc.

The "everything is politics" meme is old and annoying.

▲

JuniperMesos 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's a poltical act to eat food that tastes good, in defiance of the activists who think that the food yiu find tasty is immoral and want to make it illegal for you to do so. Something is a poltical act if other people want you not to do it and want to enforce this through law, which you have no control over.

▲

samtp 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just because you choose to ignore the externalities of your choices doesn't mean they no longer exist. It just means that you value your personal well being and comfort more than being informed about the results of your actions.

	▲	nielsbot 33 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		And have the luxury of being able to ignore them. That is a luxury.

▲

vrganj 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sure, you can. But don't pretend that's not a political choice.

▲

irishcoffee 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This is so tired. Give me a topic about personal food preferences and I can spin is 6 ways from Sunday towards whatever (or against) political bias you want.

“If you don’t participate in politics you’re evil” is an opinion that is judgmental, aggressive, frames the speaker as a bully with self-appointed moral superiority.

It’s not nice to tell people “you’re selfish and part of the problem if you just want to live a quite life away from all the crazy people who link politics to their self worth” and calling it “not nice” is a wild understatement. I see it as harassment. “Care because I think you should!”

Fuck that haha

	▲	samtp 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		“If you don’t participate in politics you’re evil” is an argument that you completely made up. You don't like to be called selfish for not considering how your actions might affect others, but others are supposed to care about how their actions might affect you? Seems like a pretty self centered attitude to have.
	▲	pixl97 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		You're almost there and then you give up on original thought at the last minute. >“Care because I think you should!” Welcome to politics. Not only do I demand that you care because I think you should, but I will smash you with the full force of the law if you don't. Now, if you decide to do nothing, well, you're getting your ass smashed by the full force of the law and whining like a little bitch saying "I'm not political, why did this happen to me". "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice". And "There are no neutrals in the reality, entropy forbids it".
	▲	vrganj 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		You seem to have fundamentally misunderstood my point. I never said “If you don’t participate in politics you’re evil”. My point is that there is no not participating in politics. The lack of participation is a political choice in itself.