| ▲ | mrhottakes 2 hours ago | |
Transactions like that happen all the time and are not problematic if handled legally. Any of the interested parties could have sued over it, but none have. | ||
| ▲ | atom_arranger 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
The interested parties would be taxpayers. I think some groups are trying to look into it. The issue is that they did R&D as a charity, donations to which are tax deductible, there may also be other benefits to being a charity during R&D but that’s a big one, then once the thing works, setup a for profit, sell ip at “fair value”, get some investment, then things are ready for business. I read there’s no statute of limitations on a tax issue like this, so I guess it might be hanging over them indefinitely. I’m not a big taxation and government fan, they’d probably just waste the money anyways. It does seem unfair OpenAI gets to use this loophole though, unless all companies can make their R&D investment tax deductible, and get any other benefits of this setup. | ||
| ▲ | adrr an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Because they got to participate in the early investment in the for profit entity. > Early Angels (Reid Hoffman, Peter Thiel, and others): Approximately $10 million invested, current value $1.4 billion. That corresponds to a return of around 140x. | ||