> Twitters acquisition is among the worst deals in human history.

That he won't have to pay for. Shareholders will, as part of the SpaceX IPO.

If shareholders have to pay the debt, then the shares will be less valuable, and Musk (whose wealth is measured in shares) will be less wealthy, no?

▲

BeetleB 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

By a tad. SpaceX's worth is an order of magnitude more than Twitter's debt. I doubt any serious person considering buying shares in SpaceX will spend even a moment worrying about Twitter.

▲

ben_w 3 hours ago | parent [-]

They probably should. I've seen people concerned a subsidiary's GDPR fine would be calculated on the basis of the parent company's global revenue, and in Musk's case something similar has happened in Brazil where Starlink's assets were frozen and justified in part because of how Musk fails to properly delineate between his businesses.

	▲	generj 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The EU also lacks incentivizes to not harm SpaceX. The US government as a whole, and DoD in particular wants SpaceX around to deliver cheap mass to orbit. Europe on the other hand would love any judgements which give their rockets a chance to catchup. So they won’t temper an investigation or fines accordingly.

▲

saalweachter 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Musk only owns 42% of SpaceX; he only takes 42% of the loss as if he continued to own Twitter outright.

	▲	nkozyra 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Well Twitter has other investors, too. But he'll also likely be shaving equity here and there along the way to hedge this bet.