What does this mean?

> It's a different kind of tool doing a different kind of work, and that makes a clean apples-to-apples comparison to earlier models difficult.

They claim it’s a different kind of tool and then describe using it the same way you’d use any other model. This really felt way worse than the average Cloudflare blog and really just rehashed the Mythos announcement which had already called out the key parts being chaining and crafting examples.

> They claim it’s a different kind of tool and then describe using it the same way you’d use any other model. This really felt way worse than the average Cloudflare blog and really just rehashed the Mythos announcement which had already called out the key parts being chaining and crafting examples.

Hah, I was trying to parse this too.

Charitably perhaps they're being vague on exactly what's different because they're still under NDA.

Sounds different because it’s hidden advertisement not a regular blog post

> way worse than the average Cloudflare blog

How long has it been since you took your average? Lately all Cloudflare output has been heavily AI'd.

My guess is because it is a model trained specifically for security/hacking. So comparing it to Opus, trained for chat/code/etc., is apples-to-oranges.

'Its not X, its Y' is also a common LLM trope.

I think what they might mean is:

Because of it's capabilities, a new kind of harness can be built for it, thus the entire system (model + harness) is a different kind of tool than say Claude code