When writing is too heavily LLM-assisted, it does actually cease to be substantive, because it becomes impossible to know which parts of it represent actual claims which the author believes as stated and which are interpolations.

▲

estearum 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No no, it the LLM-assistance makes it hard to know what is substantive. That means it puts more work on the reader, which is a totally valid thing to complain about, but which is totally different from "the poor writing is actually the whole point"

	▲	SpicyLemonZest 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		But how can the reader do the work? They don't have access to Mythos and can't review Cloudflare's internal findings or harnesses. The only practical options are to accept the article at face value or not accept it if the expected density of LLM interpolations is too high.

▲

stavros 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

All of them represent claims which the author believes as stated, otherwise the author wouldn't put their name on them.