Remix.run Logo
dwa3592 20 hours ago

>>Companies report ‘annualised’ revenue, defined as sum of previous 4 weeks multiplied by 13.

why is it multiplied by 13?

amiantos 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In business there's 52 (4*13) weeks in a year and as a result, 2080 regular working hours in a year (40*52). I think these are just generally agreed upon ways to define time for simplicity. In some (most?) systems your 'hourly wage' is simply your salary divided by 2080, trying to divide your salary by other metrics to determine hourly wage tend to wonk the numbers a bit.

dwa3592 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

this took a bit of a mathematical turn because of my poor phrasing. what i was actually intrigued by was how does revenue of 4 weeks become "annualized" by just multiplying it with 13.

vanuatu 18 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Lets say you work at a startup that is growing insanely fast and you want to report financial metrics to investors, media etc. You can't use annual recurring revenue because 2026 is not over yet, and your company is so young it doesn't make sense to look back to last year. You can't use YoY because it would be some obscene figure (100000%) that definitely won't hold.

So the two best metrics are annualized recurring revenue (take last month * 12 or last 4 weeks * 13) and QoQ growth %.

There are two caveats:

- If the revenue is high quality (e.g. annual enterprise contracts, good NRR), then last 4 weeks * 13 is actually a conservative estimate as your company will likely continue to grow.

- But if the revenue is more volatile (e.g. consumption, token usage, bad NRR) then annualized recurring revenue can be used to hide worse performance because companies will juice revenue one month and report high "ARR"

dwa3592 18 hours ago | parent [-]

I see but it's still predicted annual revenue. I can understand people not liking the word 'predicted' here because it is more grounding but that's what it is in the end? I guess i understand it now. thanks.

benedictevans 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There’s a bunch of fuzzy metrics here, which is one reason I turned it back into a monthly number. The other issue (as you’ll see on the chart) is that Anthropic and openAI are recognising revenue in completely different ways.

jurgenburgen 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Usually startups like to talk about Adjusted Annual Revenue in fundraising and other hype materials. There’s no regulation around this metric so whatever their investors are willing to accept is what they use. One way to measure it is to take the past 4 weeks revenue and multiply by 13.

ncruces 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Because that's 364 days.

neogodless 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

52 weeks / 4 weeks = 13

20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
Calc13 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

13*4=52 weeks, mostly

20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
tedd4u 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah it's weird huh? The "average" month contains 4.35 weeks.

(365/7)/12 = 4.3452…

briodf 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

28*13=364

jaccola 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

52/4 = 13