| ▲ | h1fra 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not entirely related, but Google Maps is still showing satellite images from 5 years ago in Paris, one of the most visited cities in the world, and it's not even updated once a year. I don't get it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | namibj 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Germany it seems to have moved to the 3D photogrammetry data for anything with pixel sizes smaller than a car; is that maybe also the case for Paris? I do understand that it's sad they don't calculate orthographic images from that to replace their satellite views in these areas though; full 3D is severely more resource intensive on the client after all. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | moondowner 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Many similar cases accross Europe. Visited Lisboa last summer, the building where I booked an apartment was not even there in Google Maps, satellite image data was showing a leveled site with some dumpsters. Just checked and the images are still the same old ones... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alopha 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There's no promo packet material in spending money on making the product a bit better with up to date imagery so why would anyone bother? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||