Microsoft is 1.84 Peters, Google is 0.66. What's the Peter unit?

Hmmm isn’t a lower Peter count better? From what I understand, OpenClaw is a mess, and it kind of shows from the commits. Pull requests with 1500+ commits, only reviewed by bots, etc.

Or perhaps this is what the “roast” part of the repo refers to.

Regardless, he seems to be a quantity over quality person

▲

chanux an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I thought this has something to do with the Peter Principle.

	▲	stingraycharles 43 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Both can be true.

▲

killingtime74 36 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I was wondering who this was. figured out eventually it's the author of Openclaw

▲

opengrass an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Good r&d isn't public

▲

hiddencost an hour ago | parent [-]

... Like the University system, the national labs, NASA, ...

What are you talking about?

	▲	senectus1 39 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		probably looking at apple...

▲

dvh 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Article does not explain what Peter unit is. Title is misleading.

	▲	stingraycharles 28 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It does, it’s the commit velocity.

▲

fwipsy 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can we not post clickbait to HN? My fault for clicking, I guess. An informative title would be e.g. "Compare your organization's Github productivity to @steipete."

▲

whoami22222 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

would be nice to know what's microsoft's peter units including all intenral source code as well.

▲

cowpig an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

oh great more memes about that data security catastrophe