| ▲ | Muromec 6 hours ago | |||||||||||||
>I’m personally not a fan of OpenAI always referring to their model as “providing intelligence as a utility.” Sounds very condescending, are you saying this isn’t something we already have? We do and we don't. If you would go out there and talk to a random person about elliptic curves and matrix multiplications and whether you hit a performance ceiling in a specific 2x2 multiplication thingy with Karatsuba and wnaf, they would not know half the words, but the lying and flattering machine will be able to hold the conversation. The thing will not get all things right and bullshit me about DSTU4145 using normal basis, will lie about A being set to 1 for all standard curves, but it's definitely more intelligence that you can get from a taxi driver. If it's not general superintelligence right there for five bucks a piece, I don't know what is | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 34df 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
None of those things qualify as intelligence. Is a calculator intelligent? I can 'talk' to it via pushing buttons. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | malfist 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Is a dictionary intelligent? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | preisschild 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
> We do and we don't. If you would go out there and talk to a random person about elliptic curves and matrix multiplications and whether you hit a performance ceiling in a specific 2x2 multiplication thingy with Karatsuba and wnaf, they would not know half the words, but the lying and flattering machine will be able to hold the conversation. Wikipedia has existed for decades... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||