Every moment you spend doing accessibility is a moment you spend not doing other things. You could argue it has a high RoI to do accessibility, fine, but that doesn't make it lazy _not_ to do it. Maybe I have even higher RoI/EV stuff to be doing.

▲

esseph an hour ago | parent | next [-]

You just told a bunch of potential and current customers that they're not worth the ROI.

Pretty sure they'll remember that, and they'll talk about it a lot.

	▲	0x3f a few seconds ago \| parent [-]
		Picking subsets of customers to focus on is a totally standard part of running a startup or company in general, so this is not news or really any kind of threat. You might as well tell me the suburban moms are not going to buy my developer tool because I've personally slighted them with the branding.

▲

48terry an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Maybe I have even higher RoI/EV stuff to be doing.

I mean, to readers of these comments, I think it's right there for you: 0x3f will take "higher ROI" over "accommodate and support disabled people".

	▲	0x3f an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, thats explicitly what I'm saying so I'm not sure it needs repeating. That has very little to do with it being lazy though, is the point. We were already implicitly discussing RoI when we were talking about 'legal consequences' above. This is how people decide between alternatives, generally.

▲

well_ackshually 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Accessibility is done while you do it. Not as an afterthought.

But if you're having a higher ROI writing absolute crap, feel free, it's not my website.

▲

0x3f an hour ago | parent [-]

You're just expressing a normative view here, it's not very interesting or informationally-dense. You care about accessibility more than I do. That doesn't make not doing it 'crap'.

	▲	an hour ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]