The Windows phone didn't make it due to Microsoft failing to compete, not the press.

Not many tech products exite me less than the concept of a Microsoft Windows 365 Copilot Cortana phone.

> The Windows phone didn't make it due to Microsoft failing to compete

As I recall Microsoft threw quite a lot of resources into Windows Phone.

My then-employer had apps for Android and Apple, and Microsoft literally paid for us to port it to Windows Phone. Microsoft brought Nokia, who had dominated the industry in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

And Microsoft was early to the mobile party too - you could get an iPaq H3660 running Microsoft Pocket PC 2000, seven years before the first iPhone. Keyboardless Fujitsu and Compaq tablets ran Windows XP Tablet PC Edition in 2003, seven years before the iPad.

They weren't as good as what came later. Chunky, fragile devices, resistive touchscreens, stylus input with a tiny on-screen keyboard, worse batteries, worse wifi, barely any mobile data. And at the time, $500 seemed hugely expensive compared to a normal phone, even if these days there are plenty of $1000 smartphones.

But there's an alternate reality where Microsoft had a 'first mover advantage' and captured a big slice of the smartphone-and-tablet market.

Windows phones were great at the time, everyone I knew who had a Lumia loved it, but yeah imagining what it would be like today makes me shudder.

Yes, and let's not forget Stephen Elop's 'Burning Platform' Memo

https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-TEB-2031