wondering about that line:

  A 36-year-old woman who had been unlawfully at large for more than 20 years and was wanted for failing to appeal at court for an assault in 2004.

so she was 16 when she "disappeared" (how, where, sleeping in the streets?) and the camera can link a 16 y.o. face to a 36 y.o. one after probably rough years?

▲ nomel 2 hours ago | parent [-]

What's the argument here? Thats crimes should be forgiven after 16 years, or that facial recognition is demonstrably robust?

	▲	novok 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		He is implying he doubts the accuracy of that 'match'.
	▲	sverhagen 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That it's a fishy story?