| ▲ | eugenekolo 2 hours ago | |
WOuldn't proof of that be some grounds for breach of fiduciary duty? | ||
| ▲ | tptacek an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
No. People have weird beliefs about what fiduciary duty means. It does not mean that companies are required at all intervals to maximize revenue or profit. | ||
| ▲ | jvanderbot 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Dunno - is protecting yourself from high-profile criticism by doing whatever you want with assets you 100% own and are under no contractual obligation to share ... also in fiduciary duty? | ||
| ▲ | minimaxir an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It is not illegal to be petty during business negotiations. | ||
| ▲ | 8note 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
the easy argument otherwise would be that if they sold the IP, they wouldnt be able to revive it in the future, and also they would have nate silver as a competitor in the space | ||
| ▲ | nradov 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Nope. There is really no case law to support such a legal theory. | ||