It's definitely not. It's a fundamental shift on how we interact with computers.

It's a tractors on farms kind of moment.

I brought data to this discussion. What did you bring?

	▲	treis 13 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Your data shows a 20% improvement. That's $20-100k a year depending on how much devs are paid.
	▲	dyauspitr 35 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I don’t believe your data. Velocity on my team has gone up 7x on my team over the last two months. I’m having a hard time riding product and my business analysts because they’re not coming up with stories fast enough. We’re actually thinking of having an intervention for them because they’re not using LLMs nearly as much as they should be. Designers are still hand placing components in figmas.

▲

corywadd an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Agreed, people confuse the (totally expected) bumps and bruises of early adoption with somehow equating to "this technology is useless."

The Wright Brothers couldn't cross the Atlantic in their first flier and plenty of subsequent designs crashed and burned (literally). But now air travel is commonplace. Same will happen with AI, we just have to get past these early pains.

▲

rightbyte an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Bad analogy. Horses were the automagic being replaced.