And yet, all I ever see are attacks against these convenient bogeymen with artistic exaggerations like yours... but I never see the bogeymen themselves.

▲

awesome_dude 3 hours ago | parent [-]

You've never seen the Rust evangelists?

I am genuinely jealous.

Also, I know you made a typo, but it did make me laugh

Bogeymen is what you meant

Boogymen reminds me of the joke in Millenium Man (How do you make a handkerchief dance - put a little boogie in it)

▲

pdimitar 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I actually have not, for real. And I keep getting beaten up here on HN just for daring to say it.

Makes you think who is who in this situation. Bullies screaming they are the victims.

▲

awesome_dude 2 hours ago | parent [-]

A quick scan of your comment history suggests that you see one every day ;)

And - the number of times I have been grossly downvoted for daring to utter a true word about Rust (or even Rust adjacent) will let you know your non-existent Rust evangelists are indeed the bullies - with one now screaming that he is a victim.

If you want definitive proof - look at this sub thread where you're so triggered that people talk about the mere existence of Rust evangelists (and evangelists exist for every tech - they always have and always will - which you would know given your [claimed] history in the field) that you want to argue they they aren't evangelists, they're just poor misunderstood victims.

Note: I say claimed not as a jab but because I don't know you and can only go on your claims in your profile.

▲

pdimitar 2 hours ago | parent [-]

My comment history? The very same one that keeps trying to extract out the location of those supposed Rust zealots and never even getting a single response except yesterday... and the linked comment was pretty mild? But I always get downvoted for having the gall to ask? That comment history?

Surely you mistyped that part of your comment with the one I wrote above, right? Understandable.

I guess we'll have to agree that we live in parallel realities though, reading your comment -- which I do find genuinely puzzling. Because I keep not seeing evangelists and the only one using troll-like language here is you, not me ("triggered", really?).

I am looking at the sub-thread. I guess I need new glasses. Still not seeing anyone fanatical / zealot or whatever. What I see are people who try to ground a discussion because a top comment happily tears down a straw man, and those comments are attempting to show that.

> Note: I say claimed not as a jab

Oh, I am sure. Your comment absolutely cannot be mistook for that.

▲

awesome_dude 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Just a final post

"No true Scotsman" detected

and

>> Note: I say claimed not as a jab

> Oh, I am sure. Your comment absolutely cannot be mistook for that.

I made an explicit note because I suspected that you were going to take it as such (and, as demonstrated by the sarcasm in your response, you did)

Have a nice day bud - nobody has changed their mind - it's been real.

	▲	pdimitar 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You are reaching and trying too hard to find bogeymen where they don't exist, that's my conclusion. Be more awesome, dude. :)

▲

pdimitar 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Also yeah, serves me right for trusting my phone's keyboard. :(

Editing the comment out now, thanks for pointing out the typos!