| ▲ | tintor 3 hours ago | |||||||
LIDAR isn't helpful for water. Standing water behaves like a mirror on LIDAR. | ||||||||
| ▲ | stevekemp 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
This is one of the reasons why I'm suspicious of camera-only systems, here in Finland. Half the year there's a lot of snow and ice around. Which I imagine means most of the view is "white" and "shiny". Coupled with the dark winters it's gotta be a nightmare to deal with. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | cpgxiii 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Not necessarily. Depending on angle and water depth, multi-return LIDAR can give you returns from both water surface and the road surface beneath, in the same way multi-return LIDAR can produce returns from vegetation and the ground beneath. | ||||||||
| ▲ | throwway120385 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Could you use a different spectrum of EM radiation to detect water? There are parts of the microwave band that attenuate the signal by absorption and I wonder if you could use that. The only clue a human driver has in that situation is in the visible spectrum. The lines of the road disappear from view, which can be challenging to see at night. | ||||||||
| ▲ | amluto 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
If the LIDAR can sense the road close enough to the front of the car, then it could estimate how far underwater the car is. | ||||||||