Remix.run Logo
tintor 3 hours ago

LIDAR isn't helpful for water. Standing water behaves like a mirror on LIDAR.

stevekemp 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is one of the reasons why I'm suspicious of camera-only systems, here in Finland. Half the year there's a lot of snow and ice around. Which I imagine means most of the view is "white" and "shiny". Coupled with the dark winters it's gotta be a nightmare to deal with.

whimsicalism an hour ago | parent [-]

do humans drive in it?

cpgxiii 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not necessarily. Depending on angle and water depth, multi-return LIDAR can give you returns from both water surface and the road surface beneath, in the same way multi-return LIDAR can produce returns from vegetation and the ground beneath.

throwway120385 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Could you use a different spectrum of EM radiation to detect water? There are parts of the microwave band that attenuate the signal by absorption and I wonder if you could use that. The only clue a human driver has in that situation is in the visible spectrum. The lines of the road disappear from view, which can be challenging to see at night.

amluto 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If the LIDAR can sense the road close enough to the front of the car, then it could estimate how far underwater the car is.