| ▲ | yk 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||
> “Malawi is poor because its agricultural productivity is low” is closer to a tautology than an answer. I used to make the same error. Thing is in the natural sciences this looks like circular reasoning, but in the humanities quite commonly things just hang in thin air. Case in point, the banker looks at the poor farmer and denies credit because the guy doesn't have capital, and the farmer doesn't have capital because he can't get credit. Thing is, both sides understand that. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nikanj 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
The agricultural output of Finland is dismal, with the low-quality soil, short summer and frequent cold snaps. Still doing pretty good on GDP | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||