Published CVEs seems a bad metric to use for this- unless we assume that the ratio of really nasty vulns/not-too-bad vulns is consistent.

▲

carlmr 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Also the question remains if more CVE laden code was produced in the first place, instead of automated detection improvements.

It's easier to find a needle in the haystack if the haystack is 50% needles.

	▲	red-iron-pine an hour ago \| parent [-]
		have the AI vibe code crappy apps so the related AI vuln finder can fix them just doubled the value and use cases of your AI solution!

▲

om42 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Another reason published CVEs isn't a great metric is that one of the largest contributors to the number of CVEs significantly increasing in the past couple years has been that the Linux kernel now submits almost all bugs as CVEs which wasn't the case before.