> If you don't ever have a massive PR from a dynamite session, then you cannot ever be better than "average and plodding".

That's just cope to avoid learning how to turn a big change into a well organized patch series.

▲

nixon_why69 4 hours ago | parent [-]

In retort, that's just doubling down that everything should always be average and plodding.

I'm not saying one shouldn't learn how to stage large changes into a mature codebase. Sometimes the overhead is very worth it, maybe most times if you're close to the profit center of a faang. But one should understand multiple ways of working, for different situations.

	▲	dogleash 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If you can't be arsed to prepare your code for review because it's such a buzzkill to your velocity, why are you even reviewing then? Just push to main. I'm not being snarky. I put different review standards in place for different repos on my team. Sometimes the standard is no standard. Push to main. Figure it out later.