| ▲ | atomicnumber3 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
This feels very adjacent to the story about the whole town in debt, and the rich guy leaves a $100 bill on the table, [and so on], in a way that I can't quite put my finger on. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | joenot443 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It's a cool little analogy, one I'd never heard of before https://www.econlib.org/archives/2012/01/an_answer_to_a.html > True, at the beginning each resident has a $100 liability. But each also has an offsetting financial asset of $100. At the end, they all have neither. So the $100 bill acts as a clearing mechanism | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | throwaway667555 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You can't put your finger on it because money is merely an accumulator and medium of exchange of economic performance. The performance of services in exchange for other services without money is a perfectly valid economic exchange that can and should be booked to revenue of each of the parties, if actually performed. Loans without any economic performance of services generate circular meaningless cash flows yeah, but that's not the case when services are actually performed. Loans are promises to pay. Business deals are promises to perform services or deliver goods. The difference is easily lost in the details even for accountants and economists. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | adharmad 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The man who saved Pumplesdrop By W. J. Turner | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||