Useable yes, but trustable? Not without some serious backing and regular auditing from some public security experts.

IMO that fact that the existing Vaultwarden system relies on Bitwarden clients and therefore caries Bitwardens secure reputation is its main selling point. Take that away and Vaultwarden is nothing more than some random back end software that can not really be trusted.

▲

rcxdude an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Maybe, I don't think that reputation really should transfer anyway, and it's not something I would consider necessary for using it. (I mean, some scrutiny is obviously good, but I don't think it needs to be as big as Bitwarden).

▲

troyvit 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> the existing Vaultwarden system relies on Bitwarden clients and therefore caries Bitwardens secure reputation is its main selling point.

I hope that this could be a starting point and not an end-point of Vaultwarden. It has gotten far on the shoulders of the Bitwarden giant. If it forked, would it have a large enough community to continue to carry that trust forward (including building new clients)? How much financial support would they need? Could they find a sponsor? It's a European project -- would the EU help fund it as a data sovereignty push?

	▲	alt227 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Agreed, it would be great to have a fully open source solution, however I would be wary of it until it was audited and backed by secuirty professionals in the field.