| ▲ | salsakran an hour ago | |
With all respect to the Anthropic folks, that's just marketing. (If they're reading this: let us into the program so I can be proven wrong here.) I'm sure what they have is awesome, but it's clear that there are people out there with some decent prompts that are getting results out of widely available models as well. The big thing we're sharing is: bulk scanning by random people in random geographies got a _lot_ better around January, it's widely distributed, and it's going to get a lot better regardless of whether that specific version of Mythos becomes widely available or not. | ||
| ▲ | embedding-shape an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> prompts that are getting results out of widely available models as well. Absolutely, and the "false-positive" issue people keep citing as why Mythos is so good is easily solved in the harness, simplest solution is starting fresh context with another prompt to evaluate if it's a false-positive or not, just adding that drastically cuts down the rate. | ||