|
| ▲ | flr03 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| You pay money to Palantir that money essentially escapes the economy, you develop a sovereign solution yes you pay millions even more but that goes into corporations and people actually living in the country, paying taxes and spending their coins here. |
|
| ▲ | RealCodingOtaku 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I would rather not hand mine or my neighbours' health data to a spy-tech firm, who will have unlimited access to their data[0]. Not having the system (it's not like it's already in use anyway) is always a good step in the right direction. And a replacement built-in UK will provide more jobs, more tax money, and digital sovereignty for UK. https://www.digitalhealth.net/2026/05/palantir-to-be-granted... |
|
| ▲ | razakel 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| When they first rolled out Universal Credit, they decided to do it using Microsoft Dynamics NAV. It didn't work very well, so GDS rebuilt it in-house. |
|
| ▲ | Canada 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Have you considered just not building this kind of thing at all? |
