That seems like a huge bet. I don’t bet on this, I am careful about cookies and my source IPs.

Do you have any facts? I know they really on _additional_ stuff, but do you have sources showing that they never use cookies or source IPs?

▲

schubidubiduba an hour ago | parent | next [-]

He said they don't rely on it. They can use fingerprinting. Obviously they'll still use any other data you give them, including IP addresses or cookies.

	▲	illiac786 40 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Ok, what was his point then? “They don’t rely on it, so it’s useless to obfuscate it”, or “but you should keep obfuscating it” or something else? I am missing the relation to my original comment then.

▲

fragmede 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

That's a different claim though. Obviously they'd use cookies and source IPs when they're available, because why not use all of the information available to you. That browser fingerprinting is good enough that neither of those sources are necessary is for you to decide on whom to believe.

On that topic, though, is the Mullvad Browser, who's entire intention is to defeat browser fingerprinting.

	▲	illiac786 32 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I need to test it, that reminds me, thanks. So many browsers. Does it support multiaccount containers?