| ▲ | BLKNSLVR 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Making your traffic cross jurisdictional boundaries also adds a level of difficulty for tracking usage. Local law enforcement can tap a local ISP for their records, but it would take a scale more effort to then tap a non-local service provider for their records. Each additional level of difficulty adds a cost, and at some point those costs aren't worth the potential results. (assuming that the VPN provider doesn't just roll over due to an email inquiry, or isn't a front for very cooperative law enforcement). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | adgjlsfhk1 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
the counterpoint is that making your traffic cross out of the US gives the NSA (by their ass backwards reading) permission to spy on you | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||