Most companies in the world do not have “blue teams”. They barely have any kind of security employee.

steve_adams_86 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They've got a guy (who they're considering laying off)

jermaustin1 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Don't worry the LLMs that are replacing him, are also replacing the hackers too. Pretty soon (if not already), it will just be LLMs fighting LLMs.

	▲	jpease 5 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Until both LLMs realize the only way to win is to team up against their oppressors.

▲

micromacrofoot 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

in my experience they have a person who does it sometimes when they have time, at best

▲

UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

no they don’t.

	▲	afdbcreid an hour ago \| parent [-]
		They don't consider laying him off?

▲

Veserv 17 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

That is actually unfair. Most companys spend enormous amounts on security with vast armys of security employees. Not that it is effective, but it is not for lack of resources or trying.

I mean we are literally in a thread about how the 4 trillion dollar company, literally the 3rd most valuable company in the world, with a core competency in software has, yet again, released a core product riddled with security defects for the 50th year in a row.

Commercial IT security is a industry that is incapable to a fault and has, so far, faced basically zero consequences for it.

	▲	11 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]