| ▲ | MattPalmer1086 3 hours ago | |||||||
And if pretty much any other country in the world threatened tariffs if they traded, most countries would be "meh". The US is the global superpower and a vast player economically. Pretending that what the US does here is the same as if any other country did it is disengenuous. It's an effective blockade. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Manuel_D 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
No doubt that America's embargo is more powerful because it's one of the largest import markets in the world. I'm not pretending that an American embargo is no more impactful than a smaller country carrying out an embargo. But it's unambiguously an embargo, not a blockade. These terms have long established definitions. A blockade is an act of war, carried out with military force. An embargo does not become a blockade by virtue of the fact that the country doing the embargo had a big economy. If you think the embargo is bad, that's fine. What I'm objecting to is people calling it a blockade. | ||||||||
| ||||||||