Ed Zitron is a terrible source, he is so staunchly anti AI that he is effectively blind. Once in a while he'll be right by pure chance, but I wouldn't rely on any of it.

Eh, this is an ad-hominem. Ed being anti-AI does not adress the validity of his arguments.

I think he misses the mark when he insists on AI being useless. It is useful, although far from what the people hyping AI claim.

But when he delves in the numbers, his arguments are very solid (and I am still to see someone counter him on that).