| |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What legal justification could there possibly be for imposing a tarrif on Mexico-Cuba trade that doesn't involve the US at any point? What would your reaction be if China imposed tariffs on US-Canadian border crossings and seized American ships over it? | | |
| ▲ | Manuel_D 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | A tariff is a tax that a country imposes on goods entering its borders. A country can impose a tariff on any country, at any time, for whatever reason (unless they've signed free trade agreements obligating them to refrain from imposing tariffs). > What would your reaction be if China imposed tariffs on US-Canadian border crossings and seized American ships over it? Again, the ships in being sized were flying false flags, which is illegal. If American ships decided to take this criminal act, then China is justified in enforcing the law. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > A tariff is a tax that a country imposes on goods entering its borders. Yes. And that is not what happens here! None of this oil is entering the US at all! | | |
| ▲ | Manuel_D 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Correct. But the point remains, the US is free to impose a tariff on countries that sell oil to Cuba. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | So it's not "a tax that a country imposes on goods entering its borders" now? | | |
| ▲ | baseballdork 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It seems fairly obvious that what happens is a tariff is applied to the items entering the US and not the oil going to Cuba. If you trade oil with cuba, then any trade with the US will be subject to the tariff. | |
| ▲ | Manuel_D 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, a tariff is indeed a tax a country imposes on goods entering its borders. I'm not sure what in my comment you think contradicts this. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The ships being seized are doing things like flying false flags, to try and trade with Cuba without paying tariffs. | | |
| ▲ | Manuel_D 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, they fly false flags to avoid triggering retaliatory tariffs. If country X sells oil to Cuba than country X's goods being imported to the the US will be subject to additional tariffs. I can see how this wording makes it sound like the US is charging a tariff on the oil entering Cuba, but that is not the case. The tariff in that quote is referring to the tariffs the US is promising to place on counties that don't participate in the embargo. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | vrganj 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "Criminal" according to who? The US? Then why does their law apply here? International law? Like the ICC the US ignores? Or the climate agreements it breaks? Or the Geneva convention it runs afoul of? Sure is convenient the US decided this one specific bit is to be taken extremely seriously. Either way, it stinks of imperialism. | | |
| ▲ | lostlogin 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > International law? The one the US constantly chooses to ignore? It’s a little less two faced now though, as this administration ignores US laws too. |
|
| |
| ▲ | ibejoeb 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Good question, and you'd be right that in that situation it wouldn't hold up to scrutiny. That's not what's going on, though. Instead, the tariff applies to trades American trade when it is determined that the other party is also trading with Cuba. The parent is correct; Mexico, or any other country, is free to trade with Cuba, but then it will be subject to American tariffs on American trade. It has to make the choice. There is certainly pressure, but it's on independent states to decide. | |
| ▲ | defen 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If we're imagining a world where the US can't stop China from doing that, I'd probably go on the internet and complain about it. | |
| ▲ | shimman 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It always boils down to the US ignoring international trade and laws in their favor. As you said there is nothing illegal about two countries trading. The idea the US should have a say is deeply undemocratic and frankly anti-human as well, but that's just the US for you. This podcast does a great job on highlighting how the media plays its role in justifying the imperialism too: https://citationsneeded.libsyn.com/shadow-fleets-sanctions-w... |
| |
| ▲ | iAMkenough 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Paying a tariff to a third-party government doesn’t mean the third-party government is obligated to stop pirating ships under the guise of “flying false flags.” It’s a shakedown, meant to harm Cubans. | | | |
| ▲ | luizfzs 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Trade in US Dollars with other countries need to go through US banks, which can be subject to prohibitions, which can be done by political motivation. Also, the issue of the PetroDollar complicates things internationally as well. US throws a tantrum when small countries (or countries it can bully) trade Oil in other currencies. That is very important to keep themselves relevant and with some control over international trades. Yet another aspect is that if any goods, regardless of who is selling it, contains more than 10% of components, technology, produced by a US company, such seller requires an US Export license to trade such goods with Cuba. So it's not as simple as that. https://shippingsolutionssoftware.com/blog/products-subject-... |
|
