| ▲ | mountain_peak 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Indeed - Chicago is considered "midwest" even though it is geographically in the eastern US. Maybe that's New York City-centrism from long ago? Edmonton is as far west from the geographical centre of Canada as Toronto is east. I think it's a a bit of a stretch to call the GTA "geographically central". Economically and demographically, definitely. The Weather Network, which really should consider geographic markers only, calls the GTA "central Canada". I think there would be an outcry if they started saying "eastern Canada". | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | coryrc 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Appalachian mountains. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cmrdporcupine 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
In general when I think of "eastern" for both Canada and the United States I think "coastal." Yes, I guess Vermont is considered northeast and it's not on the Atlantic, but it's really not far from it. And that's ... definitely not Ontario. Unless you count the lakes, which I mean, sure, why not? Or another definition of eastern might be "along the Appalachian range". And again, def not Ontario. Quebec is more up for debate. Most of southern Ontario is also most definitely "midwest" from a "biome" POV. The first couple times I went to Sioux Falls, South Dakota for work I was thinking it would feel like the prairies, like Manitoba or Sask or something. Nope, it looked identical to southern Ontario. In fact it was the same latitude, even. The vegetation and terrain, I felt like I was in Essex County or something. If I'd gotten in a car and driven home, it would have been directly east on the interstate and it would have been same same same corn and soy fields, maples, oaks, etc for 16 hours. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||